Today I had the pleasure of hosting the MSN Search booth at the MVP Global Summit’s product expo here in Redmond. A dev on my team and I got there around 3:30 and demo’d MSN Search and the next releases of the MSN Search Toolbar and Windows Desktop Search. We were more keen to demo the WDS stuff, since that’s what we both work on =)
It was great to meet so many enthusiastic members of the community. What I really mean by that is: it’s fun to talk with other geeks.
Oh, and I noticed Scoble showing off Channel 9 at a nearby booth, but no other familiar faces.
Were you there? Drop a note in the comments section. Maybe I’ll get a chance to crash some more MVP events tomorrow or Friday.
We celebrated the 20th anniversary of Windows at the Company Meeting this week. Check it out!
We’ve also been celebrating Microsoft’s 30th year, and MSN’s 10th.
Following the trend… what’s going to be 2005’s big contribution to the glorious Empire =)
Via BoingBoing,
The head of the IFPI in Finland (record industry shills) has told government that it’s fine that the new Finnish copyright law may make it impossible to move music to your Mac or GNU/Linux box, since this is a “privilege” and those people can just buy CD players.
“Now, we need to understand that listening to music on your computer is an extra privilege. Normally people listen to music on their car or through their home stereos”, says Kyyrae and continues; “If you are a Linux or Mac user, you should consider purchasing a regular CD player.”
I’m just… speechless.
A report came out today from Symantec (by way of CNET) that says Mozilla browsers are more vulnerable than IE. I’m not here to say they’re right or wrong (I think the web browser is the most obvious attack surface for internet-based attackers, and no popular web browser will ever be 100% secure).
However, ZDNet just published a response from Mozilla’s Tristan Nitot in which Nitot completely missed the point of the article.
Symantec used data from the first half of 2005 to demonstrate that because of its gaining popularity, Mozilla is being attacked more frequently and more ferociously than in the past. Nitot responded by claiming the following:
In the period 2003 to 2005 Secunia have issued 22 security advisories regarding Firefox 1.x, and rate it as “less critical”. In the same period Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.x had 85 Secunia advisories, and is rated as “highly critical”.
What he neglects to mention, is that Firefox 1.0 was released in the Fall of 2004, meaning that in reality, Firefox had fewer advisories in 1 year, than Internet Explorer had in all of ‘03, ‘04, and ‘05. Hardly a fair comparison.
But an even bigger concern is that Firefox didn’t gain its current relative popularity until 2005. So he’s claiming that Firefox is better because it used to have fewer vulnerabilities. By Nitot’s logic, it was very secure when a few people used it, and UBER secure when it didn’t exist yet.
I wonder how long before he tells Firefox users to stop using it, so that it can be secure again.
A lot of buzz has been made about this article.
To give you an idea of just how bad it is, read this little gem:
“If you move from 32 to 64 bit, you basically need to at least double your memory. 2 gigs in 64 bit is the equivalent of a gig of RAM on a 32bit machine. That’s because you’re dealing with chunks that are twice the size… if you try to make do with what you’ve got you’ll see less performance.
It’d be hilarious… if people didn’t take it seriously. But some people did!
To be clear, for the non-technical among you… A 64-bit machine will not make your data “fatter.” It means the addresses where your data is stored will be longer. But just because my address is 64 Wood Lane and yours is 4326 East Ocean View Parkway NorthWest Extension - doesn’t mean your house is bigger than mine. Likewise, a Word document is going to take up the same amount of memory on a 64-bit system as it will on a 32-bit system.
In fact (at least on Windows) - x64 OSes are generally better at memory management. So if anything, you’ll get more effective use of your memory in 64-bit Windows.
Yes… you will be able to use larger amounts of memory than before, although there are still limitations. They are:
1) Price
2) The available sizes for memory modules
3) The number of slots on your motherboard
4) The configurations supported by your motherboard’s BIOS and chipset.
x64 helps to remove a software limitation. Although in the Windows world we’ve had PAE for years now… which allowed the use of up to 64GB of memory on 32-bit Intel/AMD systems with 32-bit OSes.
But that was a hacky way to do it - by shifting the virtual address map around for different applications. Each app could still only address as much as it could before (theoretically 4GB, though in reality more like 2 or 3GB). That’s kind of how Apple does it on their “64-bit” systems I believe.
x64 removes the limitation for 64-bit apps, and allows much more efficient use of memory in general.
Don’t let me undersell 64-bit though. There are other advantages besides memory. For example, iAMD64 systems have twice as many General Purpose Registers as i386 systems. And if there’s anything x86 needs… it’s more registers.
Today Start.com launched their latest version (an update to the start.com/3 site) and made it available on www.start.com!!!
Check it out!
MSN also launched the MSN Phising Filter add-in for the MSN Search Toolbar. This is a great little add-in for protecting yourself and other users from falling for “phishing” scams and website spoofing.
You can get the add-in here:
[powered by WordPress.]
Hi. I'm Brandon. I'm a geek, and I work on Search technology for Windows at Microsoft. This is my blog.
The views expressed within my blog are my own - and are not in any way indicative of those of the company I work for, Microsoft, or it's employees. No warranties or other guarantees will be offered as to the quality of the opinions or anything else offered here.
Most popular searches that brought people here today:
searchfilterhost.exe (2)link start menu to
desktop (1)MacBook +Vista
+trackpad O (1)outlook 2007 search
in vista (1)desktop machine (1)search in outlook
2007 does no (1)start (1)tversity 360 vista (1)installing windows
desktop sea (1)searchprotocolhost (1)