<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Macs at Microsoft? Why not!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/</link>
	<description>Seattle Geek with lots to say.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-127773</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 07:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/#comment-127773</guid>
		<description>&quot;LeN99 - I didn’t really work on Vista to any significant degree. But you’re delusional if you think Vista isn’t selling well. There are obviously far more users of Vista than of any version of OS X, so it can’t be that bad =)&quot;


There&#039;s more users because consumers have no choice. If MSFT hadn&#039;t strong armed the other OS makers back in the day, maybe, just maybe, there&#039;d be some viable competition now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;LeN99 &#8211; I didn’t really work on Vista to any significant degree. But you’re delusional if you think Vista isn’t selling well. There are obviously far more users of Vista than of any version of OS X, so it can’t be that bad =)&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s more users because consumers have no choice. If MSFT hadn&#8217;t strong armed the other OS makers back in the day, maybe, just maybe, there&#8217;d be some viable competition now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bre</title>
		<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-108228</link>
		<dc:creator>Bre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/#comment-108228</guid>
		<description>Leave him alone. He&#039;s allowed to have a choice. I have several Macs &amp; many more PCs. They both have their    place and time. That&#039;s what is so great about the world we live in... you have the option to use one or the other or like lots of us both. They are both great in their own respective genres.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave him alone. He&#8217;s allowed to have a choice. I have several Macs &amp; many more PCs. They both have their    place and time. That&#8217;s what is so great about the world we live in&#8230; you have the option to use one or the other or like lots of us both. They are both great in their own respective genres.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emil</title>
		<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-103099</link>
		<dc:creator>emil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/#comment-103099</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you do run OS X, you can even get it on our network, although some things like getting on the WiFi take a fair bit of extra work.  Luckily there’s an IT help page that walks you through it.&quot;
whaaaaat? I&#039;ve never seen any easier way to get on WiFi than with OS X, with windows it use to be a lot trouble though.
But it&#039;s cool you like good hardware :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you do run OS X, you can even get it on our network, although some things like getting on the WiFi take a fair bit of extra work.  Luckily there’s an IT help page that walks you through it.&#8221;<br />
whaaaaat? I&#8217;ve never seen any easier way to get on WiFi than with OS X, with windows it use to be a lot trouble though.<br />
But it&#8217;s cool you like good hardware <img src='http://brandonlive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macs at Microsoft fail to shock &#124; Apple Blog</title>
		<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-101283</link>
		<dc:creator>Macs at Microsoft fail to shock &#124; Apple Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/#comment-101283</guid>
		<description>[...] all point and laugh: the folks at Microsoft use Macs! Because, you know, they make Windows, and Macs aren&#8217;t Windows, and Microsoft and Apple are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all point and laugh: the folks at Microsoft use Macs! Because, you know, they make Windows, and Macs aren&#8217;t Windows, and Microsoft and Apple are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus</title>
		<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-100125</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/#comment-100125</guid>
		<description>Mac&#039;sucks sooo bad, plus no real geek uses Apple man WTF??? the world is driven by Bill and that&#039;s just how it will be forever....

Btw..Of course nobody cares if u bring a Mac to work at Microsoft...u now y? CUZ BILL OWNS MOST OF THE STOCKS FOR APPLE. The only reason y Bill don&#039;t just squash this litlle pretensious stupid company like a bug in a windshield is cuz if he does, he&#039;ll have something called MONOPOLY....

Live with this one MACTARDS!!!!! Buy a Mac Bill say tks beotche :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mac&#8217;sucks sooo bad, plus no real geek uses Apple man WTF??? the world is driven by Bill and that&#8217;s just how it will be forever&#8230;.</p>
<p>Btw..Of course nobody cares if u bring a Mac to work at Microsoft&#8230;u now y? CUZ BILL OWNS MOST OF THE STOCKS FOR APPLE. The only reason y Bill don&#8217;t just squash this litlle pretensious stupid company like a bug in a windshield is cuz if he does, he&#8217;ll have something called MONOPOLY&#8230;.</p>
<p>Live with this one MACTARDS!!!!! Buy a Mac Bill say tks beotche <img src='http://brandonlive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft se basa en Leopard para la próxima versión de Windows &#124; QueGeek - Linux, Windows, Software, Tecnología, Internet</title>
		<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-98645</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft se basa en Leopard para la próxima versión de Windows &#124; QueGeek - Linux, Windows, Software, Tecnología, Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/#comment-98645</guid>
		<description>[...] como su equipo principal, y obviamente, usa más el sistema operativo de su empresa. Sin embargo, en un post ha dicho que se está usando Leopard como una comparación para ver lo que se puede lograr con un [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] como su equipo principal, y obviamente, usa más el sistema operativo de su empresa. Sin embargo, en un post ha dicho que se está usando Leopard como una comparación para ver lo que se puede lograr con un [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modesto</title>
		<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-98486</link>
		<dc:creator>Modesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/#comment-98486</guid>
		<description>I use RedHat....Another world</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use RedHat&#8230;.Another world</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modesto</title>
		<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-98485</link>
		<dc:creator>Modesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/#comment-98485</guid>
		<description>I use use Red Hat...Another world ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use use Red Hat&#8230;Another world <img src='http://brandonlive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damian</title>
		<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-98397</link>
		<dc:creator>damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/#comment-98397</guid>
		<description>Yeah why? i understand if you use os x primarily but vista? we all know macs are overpriced.. you can get a same spec pc laptop for half the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah why? i understand if you use os x primarily but vista? we all know macs are overpriced.. you can get a same spec pc laptop for half the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JakeB</title>
		<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-98283</link>
		<dc:creator>JakeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/#comment-98283</guid>
		<description>So Brandon, let me get this straight -- You use a MacBook, and iPhone, then you let slip you use a Nano too (but would use a Zune &#039;cause of its &#039;cool&#039; radio feature). Dude!

It&#039;s like the guy who has a few drinks and finds himself at gay clubs, but then claims he&#039;s not gay. Embrace your inner Mac fanboy (in a platonic sense, of course).

Also, as you must well know, the &#039;we&#039;re selling more copies of Vista therefore it&#039;s a better system&quot; argument is pure bunk. You&#039;re selling more copies of Vista to corporations who are forced to upgrade, though note all the stories about companies delaying implementation.

Meanwhile stories of switchers thrilled with their new Macs proliferate.

Does Cupertino have a wall where they&#039;re trying to emulate Vista? Sure they do, Brandon. Sure they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Brandon, let me get this straight &#8212; You use a MacBook, and iPhone, then you let slip you use a Nano too (but would use a Zune &#8217;cause of its &#8216;cool&#8217; radio feature). Dude!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like the guy who has a few drinks and finds himself at gay clubs, but then claims he&#8217;s not gay. Embrace your inner Mac fanboy (in a platonic sense, of course).</p>
<p>Also, as you must well know, the &#8216;we&#8217;re selling more copies of Vista therefore it&#8217;s a better system&#8221; argument is pure bunk. You&#8217;re selling more copies of Vista to corporations who are forced to upgrade, though note all the stories about companies delaying implementation.</p>
<p>Meanwhile stories of switchers thrilled with their new Macs proliferate.</p>
<p>Does Cupertino have a wall where they&#8217;re trying to emulate Vista? Sure they do, Brandon. Sure they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPhone Software &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Macs at Microsoft fail to shock</title>
		<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-98231</link>
		<dc:creator>iPhone Software &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Macs at Microsoft fail to shock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/#comment-98231</guid>
		<description>[...] all point and laugh: the folks at Microsoft use Macs! Because, you know, they make Windows, and Macs aren&#8217;t Windows, and Microsoft and Apple are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all point and laugh: the folks at Microsoft use Macs! Because, you know, they make Windows, and Macs aren&rsquo;t Windows, and Microsoft and Apple are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft se basa en Leopard para la próxima versión de Windows &#124; Bitperbit</title>
		<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-98087</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft se basa en Leopard para la próxima versión de Windows &#124; Bitperbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/#comment-98087</guid>
		<description>[...] como su equipo principal, y obviamente, usa más el sistema operativo de su empresa. Sin embargo, en un post ha dicho que se está usando Leopard como una comparación para ver lo que se puede lograr con un [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] como su equipo principal, y obviamente, usa más el sistema operativo de su empresa. Sin embargo, en un post ha dicho que se está usando Leopard como una comparación para ver lo que se puede lograr con un [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diggdugg</title>
		<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-98080</link>
		<dc:creator>diggdugg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/#comment-98080</guid>
		<description>Props on the good job at an awesome company, but many lulz at you for being proud of something like Vista. How much are they paying you to believe in that thing? Actually, never mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Props on the good job at an awesome company, but many lulz at you for being proud of something like Vista. How much are they paying you to believe in that thing? Actually, never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-98078</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/#comment-98078</guid>
		<description>windows? what is windows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>windows? what is windows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-98076</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brandonlive.com/2008/02/08/macs-at-microsoft-why-not/#comment-98076</guid>
		<description>Yup, lots of Zunes around.  I use a Nano, and even explained to J Allard why I do.  It&#039;s entirely because of the Nike+ pedometer.  If the Zune had that, I&#039;d definitely have picked it over the Nano.  Partly because it&#039;s a better device (FM radio is great for the TVs at the gym, for example) and because the Zune 2 software kicks iTunes&#039; ass.  I&#039;m not a fan of iTunes in the slightest, except for their downloadable video selection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, lots of Zunes around.  I use a Nano, and even explained to J Allard why I do.  It&#8217;s entirely because of the Nike+ pedometer.  If the Zune had that, I&#8217;d definitely have picked it over the Nano.  Partly because it&#8217;s a better device (FM radio is great for the TVs at the gym, for example) and because the Zune 2 software kicks iTunes&#8217; ass.  I&#8217;m not a fan of iTunes in the slightest, except for their downloadable video selection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
