Comments on: When version checks go wrong http://brandonlive.com/2009/10/29/when-version-checks-go-wrong/ Seattle Geek with lots to say. Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:30:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Dan http://brandonlive.com/2009/10/29/when-version-checks-go-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-130883 Dan Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:21:36 +0000 http://brandonlive.com/?p=651#comment-130883 This is one of the reasons why we have Compatibility mode, though! :) Makes the app think the Windows version number is different. This is one of the reasons why we have Compatibility mode, though! :) Makes the app think the Windows version number is different.

]]> By: Brandon http://brandonlive.com/2009/10/29/when-version-checks-go-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-130873 Brandon Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:20:22 +0000 http://brandonlive.com/?p=651#comment-130873 What it means is that bumping the minor version this time around made sense. I'm most specifically refuting the last sentence of the Ars paragraph, notably "and if that were such a concern then the minor version wouldn’t change either." What it means is that bumping the minor version this time around made sense.

I’m most specifically refuting the last sentence of the Ars paragraph, notably “and if that were such a concern then the minor version wouldn’t change either.”

]]> By: anonymous http://brandonlive.com/2009/10/29/when-version-checks-go-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-130868 anonymous Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:10:33 +0000 http://brandonlive.com/?p=651#comment-130868 But does this really mean that a major full release with serious overhaul of under-the-hood technlogies will only see the version increment to 6.2 or 6.x? But does this really mean that a major full release with serious overhaul of under-the-hood technlogies will only see the version increment to 6.2 or 6.x?

]]>